Evaluating the Complexity of Condo Disputes
Factors to Consider in Decision-Making
Condominium managers often face complex enforcement scenarios that require careful assessment of:
Nature of the violation (e.g., noise complaints, unpaid contributions, unauthorized alterations).
Time sensitivity (e.g., urgent safety concerns vs. minor bylaw infractions).
Potential for legal consequences (e.g., disputes that may escalate to legal action).
Stakeholder involvement (e.g., owners, tenants, board members, service providers).
Legal Boundaries for Condominium Managers
Scope of authority: A condominium manager cannot issue fines or sanctions without board approval.
Proper Notice Requirements: Bylaw violation notices must be specific and addressed to the unit in question, including the name of the individual responsible.
Timelines: Enforcement actions must align with the two-year limitation period set out in Alberta law.
Analyzing Condominium Dispute Resolution Strategies
Case Study 1: Unpaid Contributions
Scenario: An owner has failed to pay contributions for six months. The board has asked the manager to take action.
Resolution Considerations:
Has the owner received proper written notice?
Does the corporation have a caveat enforcement process in place?
Are the steps taken aligned with Section 39 of the CPA, which allows the corporation to recover unpaid contributions through legal means?
Case Study 2: Bylaw Violations – Short-Term Rentals
Scenario: A unit owner is repeatedly renting their unit through Airbnb, violating the bylaws.
Resolution Considerations:
Has a written notice of bylaw violation been issued, including specific details and deadlines?
Has the board authorized a formal sanction letter, or is legal action required?
Are there escalation procedures in place (e.g., warning, sanction, legal enforcement)?
Creating a Decision-Making Framework for Enforcement
Key Steps for Assessing Enforcement Scenarios
Review the Bylaws & CPA Regulations
Identify the specific bylaw or legislation that applies.
Ensure the board has the legal authority to enforce the provision.
Assess the Complexity & Risk Level
Low risk: Minor infractions (e.g., noise complaints, improper garbage disposal).
Medium risk: Recurring violations (e.g., unauthorized pet, parking disputes).
High risk: Legal disputes (e.g., unpaid contributions, damage to common property).
Determine the Appropriate Enforcement Approach
Education & Warning: First-time minor offenses may warrant a written warning.
Formal Sanction: For ongoing or severe violations, board approval is required before issuing a penalty.
Legal Action: If violations persist, legal measures such as placing a lien or taking legal action may be necessary.
Document & Communicate
Maintain a record of all enforcement actions and communications.
Ensure compliance with notice requirements (e.g., properly addressed, specific details, response deadlines).
